![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
CallmeMrSlug ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 01 Sep 2005 at 11:09am |
Maybe the bus system would work so well that the main lines would become bearable. Or, maybe, geez I hate to think it, but since we are facing this crisis, they extend the exemption for hybrids...
|
|
![]() |
|
N_or_S_bound ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 20 May 2005 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually, aren't gas prices the best incentive we've seen so far? When was the last time we saw such interest in alternative fuels on this massive a scale. I'd love to see the "hit" stats on the alternative fuel vehicle related sites on the web for the past month or so and see what's happened in the past week.
Buses only would have to mean buses only...that from a guy who does need his car for his daily work...guess I'll be in the mainlines watching the buses fly by. NoSb SOV because you can, HOV because you care! |
|
![]() |
|
NoSUV ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
quote: Good points. However, I still think we need to make a better incentive to consumers as well as the auto industry that we need to have ALL vehicles become hybrids to reduce consumption and emissions. Unfortunately, the best way to do that is through allow hybrids in the "busses only" express lanes. |
|
![]() |
|
CallmeMrSlug ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Let me also add another thing, as a former Martz rider, Martz tries to do way too much. One stop, six blocks apart, is enough. Stopping every two or three blocks when you are transporting so many people makes the ride miserable for those on the latter end of the trip. In January or February, I can see the need for dropping people close. But during spring and summer, well, I think the riders would not object to walking four blocks instead of two. It should not take 40 minutes to get out of DC after getting 45 minutes to get into it from Stafford. The Martz buses should drive directly from the Pentagon to Metro Center, let those who use metro get off, and then do their circle route. I think you would find that most people would leave and their would be less drop offs along the way saving time for all.
|
|
![]() |
|
CallmeMrSlug ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The point is that bus service, exclusively, is the right choice IF one really wants to solve the problem. And I mean exclusively, so NO SUV is on the regular lanes in his hybrid. The bus is the only vehicle allowed. Now if New Jersey can make this thing work, why can't Washington DC? I mean, no disrespect, but we at least 20 IQ points higher than them, lol. Forget the HOT lanes, restore it to a Bus only lane, and every fifteen minutes the Bus stops at L'Enfant, Union Station, Metro Centre and Foggy Bottom. Every twenty minutes, a different bus goes for military units, Fort Belvoir, Pentagon, and Navy Yard. Given a regular reliable bus system, and most importantly, a reliable way home, why would we need our cars? Now surely there would be tweaking for not so busy times between 10:00 am and 2:00 pm, but there is NO reason this can not be done.
So yeah, those who like their own cars don't like the system. Deal with it. You either have this or HOT, and I strongly suggest this is the better alternative... |
|
![]() |
|
N_or_S_bound ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 20 May 2005 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Awesome posting! Definitely makes the case, eh? Would also get the "free loaders" to help pay for their transit, huh? I can see a time in the not too distant future where I-95/395 HOV could be bus-only again. Now, what price can buses charge when THEIR roadway is subsidized by our tax dollars AND they have exclusive use of that funded roadway?
Maybe I should look into opening a bus business. I'm sure I can do better than Martz or Quicks with their fairly regular breakdowns. NoSb SOV because you can, HOV because you care! |
|
![]() |
|
CallmeMrSlug ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://www.fta.dot.gov/library/planning/RETK/retk.html
A Report by the CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION III. Transit: The forgotten HOV RECOMMENDATION 1: In congested urban areas, newly constructed roadway lanes should be primarily or exclusively for public transit. Public transit buses are the workhorses of many urban freeway HOV lanes, and would do even more if buses received higher priority. As shown by Table 1, inside back cover, [Pratt, 1991 ] even on HOV lanes that admit carpools, more than a third of the travelers are riding by bus, and on some routes they outnumber those in carpools and vanpools. Clearly, many HOV lanes are high performers only because of their usefulness to transit. The most impressive performance is on bus only lanes. The nation's (and possibly the world's) best "people-carrying" road lane is New Jersey's Route 495, where a morning bus-only lane carries more than 20,000 people an hour into the Lincoln Tunnel. The lane serves 30 percent of all trans-Hudson River commuters, more than the combined total of all 12 general purpose lanes next to it [Home and Quelch]. Also notable is the Ottawa Carleton area's network of transitways, which help OC Transpo carry 30 percent of all vehicle-based travel and 70 percent of peak hour trips to downtown [Bonsall]. Many more bus passengers are carried on exclusive bus lanes that are located on surface streets and are too numerous to list. Bus- only lanes can be found in every major city and in many smaller cities. An advantage of buses over carpools is that they require much less road space per passenger [Vuchic et al.]. At freeway speeds, a full bus can carry as many people as a lane of carpools up to a mile long. Buses are rarely so numerous as to cause a traffic Jam, a fact that helps protect the time savings of riding in a bus-only lane. Traffic jams are caused mostly by automobiles, which, even when full, require a lot more road space per passenger, and thus slow one another down. Any discussion of HOV lanes should begin with the question, "What is best for transit?" A common argument in favor of HOV lanes and other facilities is that they promote use of buses. That is not always true. Certainly preferred access for buses can speed schedules, use equipment and drivers more efficiently, and improve reliability and safety. But these benefits are lessened or lost when a bus-only lane is opened to other traffic. A leading textbook on transit facilities observes that allowing other vehicles on bus lanes "is always harmful to transit: buses can only lose from it, while all the benefits are accrued by their competitors, private autos" [Vuchic, 1981, p. 260]. Yet a survey of past evaluations of HOV lanes found in them almost no discussion of bus service productivity, schedule adherence, or safety [Turnbull, 1991, p. 44]. Ongoing pressure to open bus lanes to carpools could diminish or eliminate the lanes' relative advantages for buses. Bus-only lanes provide time and/or service improvements to riders. When an attempt is made to transfer these benefits to carpools by opening the bus lane to them, the bus riders' advantages are lost. When the El Monte and Shirley Highway busways were opened to carpools, many of the resulting carpoolers were former bus riders. Automobile trips increased as transit ridership stagnated. The same sequence occurred when carpool lanes began to compete with the bus lanes on the east 6 ReThinking HOV approach to the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge [Beroldo]. |
|
![]() |
|
MDC ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the people pulling off to wait for HOV are idiots. If they weren't idiots, they would time their commute better, or get off at Franconia and go the the FSP to get on at 6.
|
|
![]() |
|
USA ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 06 Jun 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
quote:And I applaud heartily when I see the cops writing tickets to those schmucks, as I did last Friday. Damn dangerous of them, especially the way they pull out into traffic without looking. Too bad they can't just do away with the shoulders in that area so that there would be nowhere for people to stop. As for the "15 mph at 5:55 PM" crowd, I don't see the point of doing that. Practically speaking, if it's within 5 minutes of the end of HOV most cops will give any driver the benefit of the doubt given how no two clocks ever agree--similar to how most cops will acknowledge that 5 mph over the speed limit is almost never grounds for a ticket because of the possibility of speedometer error. (Now, I know someone will say that people would just deliberately set their clocks ahead. Of course some people will, but that's not the point. The point is that to most cops it wouldn't be worth the time to argue the point.) |
|
![]() |
|
NoSUV ![]() New Slug ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
quote: Sponge, that's exactly what happens now - at least with the evening commute. Starting about 5:45 pm, cars and trucks pull off to the shoulder at the start of 395 HOV and put on their flashers. About 10 minutes later, cars with no one in front of them go about 15 mph to see if they can still be legal and hit the gas at exactly 6 pm. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |