HOV Violators and State Police Enforcement
Printed From: Slug-Lines.com
Category: General Slugging Questions and Comments
Forum Name: General Slugging Topics
Forum Description: This is the area for all general slugging comments. To add a comment simply create a new topic or see FAQ for detailed information on how to post comments.
URL: http://www.slug-lines.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5256
Printed Date: 03 Dec 2024 at 11:10am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: HOV Violators and State Police Enforcement
Posted By: keo sims
Subject: HOV Violators and State Police Enforcement
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2011 at 11:06am
In response to the complaint I sent in last week. I received this email from the VA State Police Business Manager-
*****************************************************************
Lieutenant Colonel E.A. Stockton, Director of the Bureau of Field Operations for the Virginia State Police has asked me to thank you for and respond to e-mail of June 3, 2011, concerning HOV violators and enforcement.
We certainly understand your concerns regarding those motorists who flagrantly violate the HOV lane restrictions.
It may interest you to know that during 2010, troopers issued 25,295 summonses for HOV violations. You may be assured that we will continue to address the problems you identified and ensure our available resources are effectively and efficiently utilized.
There are approximately 950 troopers who have patrol responsibility for 95 counties and nearly 65,000 miles of highway in the Commonwealth of Virginia. A manpower allocation study recently completed indicates that approximately 350 additional troopers are needed to provide the professional level of service expected of the Virginia State Police. In Northern Virginia alone the vacancy rate for troopers is approximately 15 percent.
Please be assured we are using every resource we have available to effectively address these violations on our roads and enforce the other laws we are charged with enforcing.
I am also forwarding a copy of your e-mail to Captain T.S. Russillo our Division Commander in Fairfax for her information and attention to the problems you identified.
Thank you for your concern for highway safety.
|
Replies:
Posted By: keo sims
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2011 at 3:37pm
An additonal email from the 5th Division VSP Commander.
*********************************************************************
Today I received a copy of your e-mail originally sent to the
Virginia Department of Transportation.. While I am of course concerned
regarding the amount of HOV violations you witness, as far as
not seeing one of our troopers in the HOV lanes, please allow me to
offer an explanation. The troopers in our Area 32 (VA Beach/Norfolk)
Office are tasked with patrolling the HOV lanes for compliance and
enforcement of violations. These same troopers are also required to
handle all motor vehicle crashes and calls for service in the entire VA
Beach/Norfolk area during the same times the HOV lanes are limited to at
least two per vehicle (rush hours). Often they simply cannot patrol the
HOV lanes as much they would like to.
Currently, Area 32 is understaffed by at least five (5)
troopers (not counting those on leave, sickness, or training assignments)
and as a Division; we are approximately thirty-five (35)
troopers short. State-wide, the Department of State Police is just
under two hundred and fifty (250) troopers short. Also, please let
me state that our Department is not suffering alone. Virtually every
state agency is understaffed and all budgets have been reduced as far as
possible due to economic shortfalls.
Now that you have heard my explanations, please know that we constantly
attempt to schedule extra troopers if at all possible to enforce the HOV
lanes exclusively. Whenever possible our Motorcycle Unit patrols for HOV
violations ONLY during special assignments but they are also
understaffed at this time. I am copying this e-mail to our Area 32
Office & our Motorcycle Unit so they will be aware of your concerns
regarding the HOV lanes.
|
Posted By: Pele
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2011 at 8:51pm
Man, forget Virginia Beach... You guys get done with your commute and you live near a BEACH...
We work in the hellhole that is D.C. and commute home to the middle of Suburbia... Cookie cutter houses, small yards, and the MS13 gang.
When you compare Dale City or Triangle to something like Virginia Beach, there are no redeeming factors.
Suburbia... Beach...
Look out back and see my neighbors yard... Look out back and see sand and waves...
Which would I rather prefer?
-------------------------
Times to beat:
Horner Rd to/from Pentagon: 12 mins Without Slugs - 17 mins With slugs
Dale City exit to/from 3rd St Tunnel, D.C. 18 mins (No slugs - Holiday)
|
Posted By: ktzmom
Date Posted: 07 Jun 2011 at 3:21pm
I'm from VA Beach; I live here.
You don't want to live in VA Beach. Gangs are even worse there b/c there is absolutely NOTHING else to do - other than go to a dirty, over-crowded beach.
|
Posted By: keo sims
Date Posted: 08 Jun 2011 at 9:09am
Update
A VA State Police Srg. called me yesterday and thanked me for my complaint..she stated that are very much aware there is a real issue with violaters in the HOV lanes and assured me they are doing all they can to try and prevent it. She also said that within the next couple of weeks there will be several "target" days..she said that on these days we will notice heavy police patrol in the HOV during peak hours. Of course she did not go into any detail of when these days would occur but she did state that they will be coming up soon.
|
Posted By: ktzmom
Date Posted: 08 Jun 2011 at 11:01am
|
I've already seen them out twice this week - Monday and today. Lots of cop cars in the HOV lanes at 8:45 am.
|
Posted By: mpatoka
Date Posted: 08 Jun 2011 at 12:23pm
Besides not having enough manpower to constantly check each exit/entry point, by not checking consistently, I think they let the cheaters get in a little comfort zone which increases the number of cheaters and then they can nab a higher number on their "sting" days.
In reality, if there was constant 100% monitoring, the law of diminishing returns states that there would eventually be no violaters, resulting in no revenue to make it worth keeping the extra troopers monitoring the HOVs. That being said, when they used to monitor the Springfield HOV exit ramp daily, there would always be 3-4 cars pulled over at any given time.
|
Posted By: smithma
Date Posted: 16 Jun 2011 at 4:04pm
quote:
Originally posted by mpatoka
Besides not having enough manpower to constantly check each exit/entry point, by not checking consistently, I think they let the cheaters get in a little comfort zone which increases the number of cheaters and then they can nab a higher number on their "sting" days.
In reality, if there was constant 100% monitoring, the law of diminishing returns states that there would eventually be no violaters, resulting in no revenue to make it worth keeping the extra troopers monitoring the HOVs. That being said, when they used to monitor the Springfield HOV exit ramp daily, there would always be 3-4 cars pulled over at any given time.
True about the Springfield ramp, but two nights ago I watched the two officers standing there let a SOV with GSA tags drive right by and then waved at the older couple (2 in car) with FD plates as they drove past.
They really need to ENFORCE the rules.
|
|